Influência do sobrepeso sobre a Estrutura de Sustentação Osteomuscular
Abstract
In this century, among the numerous chronic diseases, we highlight obesity and osteoporosis as a result
of the growing and high prevalence which are now considered epidemic and two major public health
problems. There is little multidisciplinary research related to musculoskeletal clinical symptoms in patients
with overweight and simultaneously evaluating the state of the musculoskeletal support structure and
bone composition. The New Biology Bone, from an early age enables to trace the two bone matrix (protein
and inorganic) that make up the support structure of the entire musculoskeletal system. Nowadays you
can trace comprehensively bone protein matrix and detect early changes resulting from the habits,
drugs, idleness, hormone deficiencies, obesity, chronic diseases among others. The old understanding
that obesity exerts protective action to fractures was commuted by research in molecular level, which
found that adipocytes and osteoblasts share the same progenitor cell. Objective: To trace the two bone
matrix and compare the pattern of bone support structure in healthy young adults and on overweight.
Result: The comparison showed that both qualitative tools accused significant difference at p <0.001.
Stratification of UBPI tool revealed bone quality was poor in 7.7% of the patients with overweight and
none in the control group. Stratification Profile Biophysical Bone (PBO) detected in 43.1% of overweight
with Inverse Profile and none in the control group. Regarding quantitative tool (T-score) we didn´t detect
differences in its three stratifications. Conclusion: In patients with overweight an early analysis of two
bone-qualitative tools (PBO and UBPI) provide important information about the musculoskeletal support
structure and enables the clinical nutrition specialist to develop preventive actions in the short term.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A obesidade é definida como uma doença pela American
Medical Association (AMA)link, abran.com.br. http://
abran.org.br/para-profissionais/obesidade-definidacomo-
doenca.Acesso em 04/02/2016.
Lobstein T, Jackson-Leach R, MoodieML, HallKD,
Gortmaker SL,Swinburn BA,James WP,Wang Y, Mc
Pherson K.Child and adolescent obesity: part of a bigger
picture. Lancet.2015, 385:2510-2520.
World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing
and managing the global epidemic. Report of WHO
Consultationon Obesity. Geneva; 1998.
Obesity: a plural perspective -Scielo.www.scielo.br/
scielo.php?pid=S1413-812320100001 00024&script, link
https://www.google.com.br/ #q=prevalencia+da+obesida
de+no+mundo Acesso em 28/01/2016.
IBGE,2014. IBGE mostra que a população brasileira
está mais gorda. Link: http://www.news.med.br/ p/
saude/69728/ibge%2Bmostra%2Bque%2Ba%. Acesso
em 26/01/2016.
Goldenberg J,2007. Coluna Ponto e Vírgula, Edit.
Atheneu 2007.
Shen W, Velasquez G, Chen J, Jin Y, Heymsfield SB,
Gallagher D, Pi-Sunyer FX Comparison of the relationship
between bone marrow adipose tissue and volumetric bone
mineral density in children and adults. J ClinDensitom.
;17(1):163-9.
Bredella MA, Lin E, Gerweck AV, Landa MG, Thomas BJ,
Torriani M, Bouxsein ML, Miller KK.Determinants of bone
microarchitecture and mechanical properties in obese
men. J ClinEndocrinolMetab. 2012 Nov;97(11):4115-22.
Adler BJ, Kaushansky K, Rubin CT.Obesity-driven
disruption of haematopoiesis and the bone marrow niche.
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(12):737-48.
Rosen CJ, Bouxsein ML Mechanisms of disease: is
osteoporosis the obesity of bone? Nat ClinPractRheumatol.
;2(1):35-43.
Cohen MM Jr, The new bone biology: pathologic,
molecular and clinical correlates. Am J Med Genet A.
, 140: 2646-2706.
Cadossi R, Cané V. Pathways of transmission of
ultrasound energy through the distal methaphysis of the
second phalanx of pigs; in vitro study.Osteoporos Int.
; 6: 196-206.
Reginster J Y. Reproducibility and diagnostic sensitivity
of ultrasonometry of phalanges to asses osteoporosis
.Int.J.Gyn.Obstet 1999; 63: 21-8.
Ribeiro RR, Qualidade e quantidade óssea avaliada
pela ultrassonografia de falanges em crianças brancas
e negras de seis a onze anos de idade. Tese doutorado
UNICAMP, 2009.
Ribeiro RR, Guerra-Junior G, de Azevedo Barros-Filho
A. Bone mass in schoolchildren in Brazil: the effect of
racial miscegenation, pubertal stage and socioeconomic
differences. J Bone Miner Metab. 2009; 27: 494-501.
Wüster C, Albanese C, deAloisyo D, Duboeuf F,
Gambacciani M, Gonnelli S, Glüer CC, Hans D, Joly
J, Reginster JY, Terlizzi F, Cadossi R. Phalangeal
osteosonogrammetry study: age-related changes,
diagnostic sensitivity and discrimination power. J Bone
Miner Res 2000; 15: 1603-1614.
Ferreira RA, Estudo comparativo dos instrumentos de
medidas entre duas propedeuticas. Avaliaçãoprecoce
da perda de tecido ósseo (DBM Sonic 1200E-second
generation X Dexa) – Qualificação de mestrado. DGO
FMRP-USP, 1998.
Ferreira RA, Novais DA, Iannetta O. A comparative study
of two instruments for measuring the loss of bone mass:
Dual x–ray absormetry and DBM Sonic 1200E -second
generation- World Congress on HumanReprodution.
MonduzziEditore, Salvador, Bahia,1999; 4-8.
Buckwalter JA. Tecidos musculoesqueleticos e sistemas
musculoesqueleticos.in: Buckwalter JA, Weinstein SL,
editors. Tratado de OrtopediaTurek,Sao Paulo: Manole;
p. 13-43.
Seeman E; Delmas P. Bone Quality — The Material and
Structural Basis of Bone Strength and fragility. N Engl J
Med 2006, 354: 2250-61.
Antoniazzi F, Bertoldo F, Lauriola S, Sirpresi S, Gasperi
E, Zamboni G, Tato L. Prevention of bone desmiralization
by calcium supplementation in precocious puberty
during- releasing hormone agonist treatment. J
ClinEndocrinolMetab 1999;84(6): 1992-6.
Reid IR, Plank LD, Evans MC. Fat Mass is an important
determinant of whole body bone density in premenopausal
women but not in men. J ClinMetab 1992;75:779-782.
Douchi T, Yamamoto S, Oki T et al. Relationship
between body fat distribution and bone mineral density
in premenopausal Japonese Women. ObstetGynecol
;95:722-725.
Crepaldi G, Romanato G, Tonin P, Maggi S. Osteoporosis
and Body Composition.J EndocrinolInvest2007;30(6Sup
pl): 42-47.
Bandeira F. A obesidade realmente fortalice os ossos?
Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
;51(6): 895-897.
Janicka A, Wren TA, Sanchez MM et al. Fat Mass is not
beneficial to bone in adolescents and young adults. J
ClinEndocrinolMetab 2007;92: 143-147.
Gonçalves EM et al., Brazilian Pediatric Reference Data
for Quantitative Ultrasound of Phalanges According to
Gender, Age, Height and Weight.PLOS ONE/ journal.
pone 2015, (4):1-16.
Iannetta R,Ferreira RA, Iannetta, O. Analise da topologia
óssea em 2140 pacientes no período do climatério.
Predição do risco de fraturas osteoporótica da senilidade.
Revista Reprodução & Climatério, 2008; 23:26-31.
Alexandersen P, Terlizzi F, Tanko LB, Bagger YZ,
Christiansen C. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound
of the phalanges with conventional bone densitometry in
healthy postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int. 2005;
: 1071-8.
Iannetta O; Marchini JS; Suen V; Guerra Jr. G. Osteoporose:
uma ex-enfermidadesilenciosa. RibeirãoPreto –SP. Edit.
Tecmedd; 2006.
Calixto N, Suen VM, Iannetta R, Marchini JS,Iannetta
O. A Nova Biologia Óssea: rastreamento precoce do
processo de formação e deterio ração do tecido ósseo
- Artigo de Revisão e Atualização Revista Brasileira de
Ultrassonografia 2010; 9: 10-17.
Calixto NB, Suen VM, Marchini JS, Iannetta O. Bone
Quantity and Quality in Pacients with Premature
Ovarian Fail of Differents Causes. NAMS, 21St ANNUAL
MEETING, Chicago, 10-2010.
Iannetta R, Calixto N, Marchini JS, Iannetta O. Novo
cenário da osteoporose. Avaliação por meio do T-score
e do Perfil Biofísico Ósseo em 1392 pacientes da rede
pública. Revista Brasileira de Ultrassonografia. 2013;
:7-10.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22565/ijn.v9i2.239
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Comments on this article
by uebiguou Gabriela Maria Javorski (2016-11-29)
by uebiguou Gabriela Maria Javorski (2017-02-14)